- From: Steven Dale <sdale@stevendale.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:38:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: <sdale@stevendale.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Joe Clark said: >> And isnt that what we are after here? Accessibility? > > If you have a choice between a dog of a browser that doesn't work with > pixel-sized fonts, found in real-world sites, and a newer browser that > does (*and* has tabbed browsing, popup blocking, better standards > compliance, and the like), why would you go with the dog? > > Now, if you *don't* have a choice, that's *different*. Let's just stop > pretending that the Web equals IE for Windows. > I am NOT saying IE for Windows = WEB, I am saying MOST use IE for Windows to browse the web. I think we NEED to write for the lowest common deniminator. If no one still uses program x, then we dont have to worry about it, but if 1 person HAS to use program y, then it should be taken into account. >> Sounds to me like many so called experts on here want the prestige >> without doing the work. > > I do quite a lot of work, thank you very much. > I know you do, I own a copy of your book, and that was why I was dissappointed to see your comments. But, I may have taken your obnoxious attitude a bit too seriously here. I did enjoy it while reading the book. -brother Steve
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 16:38:24 UTC