- From: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 15:18:48 -0500 (CDT)
- To: Steven Dale <sdale@stevendale.com>
- Cc: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> AMEN!
...sister!
> And isnt that what we are after here? Accessibility?
If you have a choice between a dog of a browser that doesn't work with
pixel-sized fonts, found in real-world sites, and a newer browser that
does (*and* has tabbed browsing, popup blocking, better standards
compliance, and the like), why would you go with the dog?
Now, if you *don't* have a choice, that's *different*. Let's just stop
pretending that the Web equals IE for Windows.
> Sounds to me like many so called experts on here want the prestige
> without doing the work.
I do quite a lot of work, thank you very much.
> Joe Clark, for example, showed a very arrogant and unrealistic
> demand for everyone to make people upgrade.
I demanded nothing. I could start, though.
> Julian Scarlett said:
> > James Craig wrote:
Wow. A double top-post.
--
Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
Expect criticism if you top-post
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 16:18:40 UTC