- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@teleservicios.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:00:17 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>, Vincent Flanders <vincent9@gte.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Am I correct in thinking that it's not only the rate of change that matters, but the visual presence of the image in the page? I mean it's size, the proportion of the canvas that changes, maybe also the color contrast. It would be useful to be able to spider a site and know whether there are any animated GIFs or not. Alan Chuter achuter@teleservicios.com On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:09:12 +1100, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org> wrote: > > As far as I know there aren't any tools that do this. You're right, it > was old news in 1999 that this is possible, so I imagine there are tools > that do it. > > cheers > > Chaals > > On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 15:31 Australia/Melbourne, Vincent Flanders > wrote: > >> >> I haven't examined every accessibility verification tool out there, but >> it seems rather strange to me the ones I've looked at want me to >> manually examine each GIF file for flicker. Even *I* know that it's >> possible for a programmer to examine the contents of a GIF file and tell >> if it's animated. Are there any accessibility tools out there that check >> the GIFs for you and eliminate the ones that obviously aren't animated? > -- > Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org > Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org > > > > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 03:02:57 UTC