- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 09:12:38 -0500
- To: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>, David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I disagree with this. AS a braille display user, I don't need nonsense on my display. alt="" is the magic string for nonesential images. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Access Systems" <accessys@smart.net> To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:51 AM Subject: Re: screen readers for macs - also bobby question On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, David Woolley wrote: > > example 2: for purely decorative images it has become > > general practise to use empty alt attributes. that is > > just to satisfy bobby and wai. how is that more > > accessible than a missing alt attribute? > > A missing alt makes the HTML invalid. I think the idea was that requiring > the attribute would make people think about it, but, of course, people just and if you are using text, you never know wheather it is "just for pretty" or critical information...I think EVERY piece of graphic no matter how unimportant the writer thinks it is (well it must be important he coded it) it should be left to the reader to decide if it is valuable. even if the alt tag is "pretty curlicues" it should be there. I don't think any alt should ever be empty for any reason if it displays for any user the information should be there for every user. Bob "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# *# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2003 09:12:40 UTC