- From: Bill Mason <w3c@accessibleinter.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 09:22:14 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 09:00 AM 2/7/2003, Tim Roberts wrote: >However, in doing so the link may now be apparent through the value of the >alt attribute (or title if the logo only text). Are you bringing that up to say it's a good or bad thing? I'm not clear. >What, then, is th ebest suggestion for populating these attributes. > >for example >alt="Site Name: link to home page." I wouldn't include any mention of a link in the IMG ALT. The ALT should simply reflect whatever message the logo itself expresses, typically the site name/company name. >and obviously if the logo was textual, should a title of >title="links to home page" >suffice? I would not include the TITLE on an IMG tag, at least not a title that talks about the hyperlink. The A tag's TITLE could certainly reflect where the link is going to go. Depending on how a text "logo" is marked up, I would keep link info in the A tag TITLE as well, not the tag that identifies the text-only "logo" as such. Bill Mason Accessible Internet w3c@accessibleinter.net http://www.accessibleinter.net/
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 12:22:49 UTC