- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Images as objects are badly specified though, since the UA cannot know it's > an image until after it's performed an HTTP GET on the url, it can guess it That's what the type parameter is for. > might be, but cannot know. > > Equally, what happens with an HTML document returned with a 404 status code Because img isn't a first class link either, you lose the information with the 404. > returned by the server, should the object fallback be used, or should the > HTML document be used? What about other status codes? At least with image, I would expect the fallback. > you know the author intended it to be an image, and not just about anything.
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 15:48:03 UTC