- From: <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:41:15 +0200 (CEST)
- To: timwgo@www.wiseguysonly.com
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 27 Jun, Tim Roberts wrote: > Hi Tina, What is the affect on point B and related subsequent points > if the authour includes: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> > > at the head of his work. Let's see. If he, at point (c) I believe, go to XHTML 1.0 Strict instead of XHTML 1.1 ? Then, y'know, he'll get off with serving it as text/html ... but he *might* just violate WCAG 11.1. Let me add some points: (c-1) He reads the WAI, and chooses - based on 11.1 - the latest version of XHTML. That would be 1.1, yes ? Or are you by this trying to say that "I meant XHTML 1.0 Transitional all along, and not XHTML 1.1 even if that is the latest and most thoroughly structure/layout separated version" ? Oh, I hope not. If so we're boiling down to "What, exactly, are the accessibility differences between XHTML 1.0 Transitional and HTML 4.01 Transitional, and that would just so water this debate down to nothing. > PS, nice talk in your previous message. Thankyou. I'll take that as a compliment. I always take some time out to moderate what I first wrote. I wouldn't want to hurt anyone. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 07:41:42 UTC