W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: XHTML/XML some constructive comments required.

From: Tim Roberts <tim@wiseguysonly.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:28:13 +0100
To: tina@greytower.net, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030627112813.M65638@wiseguysonly.com>

Hi Tina,

What is the affect on point B and related subsequent points if the authour

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"

at the head of her work.


PS, nice talk in your previous message. 

>    (b) The author now reads an article that states "accessibility is
>        important!" and "XHTML is inherently accessible". The server
>        sends it out as "text/html" as usual. The author doesn't 
> bother       about validation, 'cause that thing over at 
> validator.w3.org just       blabbers about details (actual quote). 
> The document works exactly       the same in IE - it error-corrects 
> the HTML it gets. He is happy,       and believes he has done his 
> for accessibility.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 07:34:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:16 UTC