Re: More references on XML/XHTML and accessibility

On 27 Jun, Tim Roberts wrote:

> This stuff is at last accessibility related again.

  It never left.

  This, the entire debate, is important. It is important because of the
  myths it is exposing *even on the WAIG IG* list.

  I see us quite clearly moving into a situation in which more and more
  people will write XHTML because "someone said it is accessible!",
  sending it as text/html, and every browser there is error correcting
  for the same, foolish, mistakes that are done with HTML today.

  This'll be a GREAT step for accessibility. Backwards.

-- 
 -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
   tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
   [+46] 0708 557 905

Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 06:51:32 UTC