- From: David Dorward <david@us-lot.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 00:24:10 +0100
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:16:02 -0700, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > Skip Navigation links are there to compensate for a deficiency in > HTML. > > Namely, there's no good way to designate "sections" of a page which > can't be navigated through easily. The browser can't figure out > which is which, and so needs help from the author. Skip Navigation links allow users to skip past repetitive content that they don't want read/listen to/feel/etc again. There is no deficiency in HTML, we have the <h?> series of elements to mark up the beginning of sections, all the user has to do to skip past the navigation is to skip to the next heading - but most browsers don't implement features that make that possible, hence the use of an element that browsers do implement. On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:31:20 -0700, Kynn Bartlett wrote: > Oh, PS: Skip Navigation links are entirely presentational markup for A skip link is not presentational markup, it defines a relationship between some inline content and another part of the document. (Admittedly 'Skip to main content' would be more meaningful as the link text then 'Skip navigation'). > one specific media type One specific media type? I have personally used skip links when navigation a page on a set of speakers, on a handheld device, on a projection and on a normal screen. That's FOUR media types! -- David Dorward http://david.us-lot.org/ Redesign in progress: http://stone.thecoreworlds.net/ Microsoft announces IE is dead (so upgrade): http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2003/5/30/microsoft-announces-ie-is-dead
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 19:24:14 UTC