Re: Skip Nav (was RE: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google)

Sure. But I would suggest that it is a better idea to think of a future 
where styling information can be passed to the synthesiser, than to 
think of one where speech synthesisers don't allow customisation of any 
sort.

There is a separate question of whether CSS is a good styling mechanism 
- for audio browsers I would suggest that it is a good approach, but 
what about Window-eyes, which is expected to work with all the 
different programs a user runs on their machine? (Actually IMHO if it's 
a good enough mechanism for MS Word and my IRC client it probably does 
make sense for screen readers too).

cheers

Chaals

On Saturday, Jun 14, 2003, at 16:59 Europe/Zurich, David Poehlman wrote:

>
> in my experience with aural css, it only works with sapi complient 
> speech
> synthesizers.  Mine is not sapi complient and in fact, does not even 
> relie
> on software except for rudimentary communication.  All the speeking is 
> done
> in the box.
--
Charles McCathieNevile                          Fundación Sidar
charles@sidar.org                                http://www.sidar.org