- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:41:58 -0400
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
The best use for an aural css is for aural devices for delivery. Since there are so many different screen readers and since they controll the presentation themselves, aural css does not yeild anything for them. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 7:07 AM Subject: Re: Skip Nav (was RE: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google) > This is a problem with screenreaders. :) Really, the CSS specification No. It's a chicken and egg problem. Screenreaders won't handle aural style sheets in preference to visual ones until the majority of authors use them properly, and one reason why they don't do that is that screenreaders don't handle aural ones. The main reason, of course, is that authors don't care about screenreaders.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 08:45:13 UTC