- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:33:23 -0400
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Screen readers are not aural devices. The provide a means where by one should be able to opperate in their respective environment as long as the information and interactivity does not have to be "seen". ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com> To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@sidar.org> Cc: "Mike Rundle" <phark@phark.net>; "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:28 PM Subject: Re: Skip Nav (was RE: "Think EUO, not SEO"/Google) On Friday, June 13, 2003, at 07:41 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > As Bill said, this causes a problem for screen readers. This is a problem with screenreaders. :) Really, the CSS specification is pretty clear in allowing a user to specify style rules as being only for screen display, or as being intended for aural display. If an aural device chooses to ignore "aural" media type rules, and instead honor "screen" media type rules, that's honestly not the fault of the Web developer who is following the spec. There are serious problems with compromising standards-compliant practices in order to account for broken implementations of the standard. If a screenreader user is complaining about only seeing what is on the screen, and not hearing the "aural" content, that's something she should take up with her screenreader developer. (That's not to say that you couldn't, for example, generate a specific screenreader Web interface in order to compensate for the broken screenreader, just as you can do this with other broken software if you choose. But really, you shouldn't be defacing Web designs because screenreaders want to act like "screen" media instead of "aural" media.) --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Author, CSS in 24 Hours http://cssin24hours.com Inland Anti-Empire Blog http://blog.kynn.com/iae Shock & Awe Blog http://blog.kynn.com/shock
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 19:35:10 UTC