- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:37:36 +0100
- To: Joe Clark <joeclark@joeclark.org>
- Cc: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <85CD1778-96E5-11D7-BA90-0003939B5AD0@btinternet.com>
Joe, can you identify why traintrack.svg is accessible? can current screen readers access the content? in a way that a non sighted reader can navigate successfully? How about keyboard users? it is not possible to tab to any of the links, this seems problematical for keyboard users, though the arrows do work well for forwards and backwards, but is this a standard? (The index page represents a particularly good range of issues, try using the arrows ,this should be like a tab, but instead in OSX IE it starts from the beginning, sadly on OSX mozilla its a disaster, with the index page and other pages displayed at the same time:-() It certainly has a relatively simple if perhaps non-standard interface, but might perhaps be considered rather large for an example. can we create or find one, possibly small example of an interactive SVG site, that we can agree is fairly accessible for what is currently possible. (If it is small we can re-write it fairly easily.) Thanks so much, Jonathan On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 05:18 pm, Joe Clark wrote: > >> There is plenty of comment on the accessibility of flash, but where >> are >> the examples of how it should be done? >> Can anyone point to any body of interactive SVG examples that are >> accessible? > > See if this one works. I don't know of a validator or tester for SVG > access. > > <http://unadorned.org/talks/traintrack/> > > Cf. > <http://unadorned.org/dandruff/archives/2003/05/26/001741.html#001741>. > > -- > > Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org > Author, _Building Accessible Websites_ > <http://joeclark.org/access/> | <http://joeclark.org/book/> >
Attachments
- text/enriched attachment: stored
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 19:34:10 UTC