- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:05:43 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Some people at IG seem to read my 'head in the sand' comment as personal to David, it certainly is not! The W3 guidelines are text based, and GL not only appears content with this; but is avoiding the issue of other W3 technologies, interactivity and games*. Alt tags do not make a game accessible. My students cannot read, but more than this they need a responsive and accessible environment in order to learn, without guidelines this is very difficult to achieve. We urgently needs to address not only the accessibility of W3 technologies such as SVG but also scripting including ECMA script )the document I originally authored some years ago has not been adopted; and nothing similar has been published either :-(. If browsers were made so that one could not do the things that are supposedly best left to say the OS, then our users and their helpers would be very seriously disadvantaged, as I would not be able to 'help' them. The guidelines need to include examples of why, and for what reason, they can be broken, and show how to do this as accessibly as possible. One could compare this with a driving instructor's car, different needs will require duplication of discrete parts. thanks Jonathan *an excellent example of this is the failure to raise any response to Steffie, Moo and Splat.
Received on Monday, 2 June 2003 09:02:19 UTC