- From: Lauke PH <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:40:31 +0100
- To: "w3c-wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Having come across this issue, and reading about the
problems regarding hidden text, I had a thought:
how about using a transparent gif/png over the
background image, with the same size as the image you'd
normally have ? Maybe a convoluted kludge, but certainly
not more convoluted than the current hidden text monstrosity...
.image {background: url(2.gif);}
a:hover.image {background: url(1.gif);}
<p><a class="image" title="link title"
href="url.com"><img src="transparent.gif" alt="blah" width="250"
height="100" /></a>.</p>
Patrick
________________________________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirabella, Mathew J [mailto:Mathew.Mirabella@team.telstra.com]
> Sent: 21 May 2003 05:50
> To: w3c-wai-ig list
> Subject: image rollovers in css. what is content and what is
> presentation. background vs foreground.
>
>
>
> All.
>
> I have been thinking of ways to create the image rollover
> effect for links using css instead of java script. That is,
> where an image link has the image changed on rolling over the
> link with the mouse pointer. Can anyone suggest a better way
> than my initial ideas below?
>
> One idea is to use css like the following
> .image {background: url(2.gif);}
> a:hover.image {background: url(1.gif);}
> span.hidden {visibility: hidden;}
> to work with html such as;
> <p><a class="image" title="link title"
> href="url.com"><span class="hidden">Link Text</span></a>.</p>
>
> This way the text of the link appears when css is not supported.
>
> However, there are a few problems, not the least of which is
> the issue of the inaccessibility of hidden text for some
> screen readers.
>
> One issue is that this css uses images for backgrounds,
> rather than using images as part of the link itself. This
> means that the link content (or link phrase) comes into
> issue. I have not found a way to specify the width and
> heights of these images relative to the html element (such as
> a, or p, or div). various combinations of using display:
> block; and width/height css properties does not seem to get
> there. This is a quite messy solution.
>
> Any other methods or suggestions?
>
> This leads me to a philosophical question of what is content
> and what is presentation. Most may agree that images on a
> page are examples of "content", and the way they are laid out
> etc is the "presentation". In the case of JavaScript
> rollover images, the images are part of the content in a
> way. But it seems that css examples like mine above pushes
> these images into the realm of "presentation". This may be
> ok for some cases, but what if the images contain information
> that is important? i.e. part of the content as is the case
> with normal static images on a page?
>
> If css is to be used, how can alternative text be provided
> for such images? Is the use of JavaScript therefore
> ultimately a better way of doing this roll over effect than css?
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> Mat.
>
>
>
> Mat.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 04:41:44 UTC