- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:43:46 +0100
- To: James Craig <work@cookiecrook.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
1. no, | is often used, this is not a bug. 2. why can't you use the date or post <number> ? I had a similar problem and eventually found a sensible way to label the items differently. Jonathan On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 10:50 PM, James Craig wrote: > > I feel I have a pretty good understanding of web accessiblity and > believe that my personal site conforms (for the most part) to the > Level Triple A guidelines of the WCAG. However, I have a few > questions, or "user checks" if you will. > > I also know Bobby has shortcomings in some areas and these are mainly > where my questions arise. Bobby has flagged some things that I think > are non-issues though I'm particularly unsure on one of them. > > 1. "Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace." is flagged > with adjacent anchor tags even if they are not both links. I believe > this is a Bobby bug and not an accessibility problem. Would you agree? > > 2. "Do not use the same link phrase more than once when the links > point to different URLs." refers to WCAG Section 13.1 Priority 2 which > states "Clearly identify the target of each link." This is the one I > am unsure about. I have permanent links to each of my web log posts > where the link text is consistently "#" but each anchor has a unique > title attribute of "permanent link to post <number>". Would this > suffice for "clearly identifying the target"? Arguably, I could pick > some link text that would be moer clear, like "link", but doesn't the > unique title suffice the requirement for WCAG? > > The page in question is: > http://www.cookiecrook.com/weblog.php > > I know Bobby has some bugs and that's why I list my accessibility link > as "WCAG compliant" instead of "Bobby approved". I just wanted to see > if the experts on this list had opinions on the noted issues. By the > way, CynthiaSays doesn't flag them. > > Thanks in advance, > James Craig > > -- > http://www.cookiecrook.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 09:40:39 UTC