- From: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:36:58 -0400
- To: <gian.sampsonwild@families.qld.gov.au>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
You might want to try http://www.cynthiasays.com Sincerely, Mike Burks -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of gian.sampsonwild@families.qld.gov.au Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 12:32 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Bobby turning corporate I have found this problem with Bobby as well. Gian ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Send reply to: e-wigg@evanston.lib.il.us From: Edward Wigg <e-wigg@evanston.lib.il.us> To: Multiple recipients of list <web4lib@sunsite.berkeley.edu> Subject: [WEB4LIB] Desktop Bobby licensing As I know there are quite a lot of people out there who use Bobby this might be of interest, though I'm not sure how many of you use the desktop version rather than just the web based tool. I came across a story that claims there is a significant change in the functionality between version 4 and the new version 5 (specifically you can no longer save site reports as html, making such reports unsharable except to people with their own licensed copy of the program). The sneaky part is that there is apparently nothing that tells you about this change except wording hidden in the click-through EULA seen during install. It appears that the chances of your getting your money back if you don't like this undisclosed change are not good. Read the details of one person's experience at: <http://www.jasonlefkowitz.net/blog1archive/000292.html> This kind of behavior probably confirms the misgivings that I know that some people had when CAST sold Bobby to Watchfire, and it also is another example of why making bad EULAs strictly enforceable (as is the case in UCTIA states) is problematical. Edward ============================================= The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient(s) only. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you must not copy, distribute or take any action that relies on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the message. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. Department of Families provide no guarantee that all possible viruses have been detected and cleaned during this process. =============================================
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 07:37:06 UTC