- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> > accessible versions, e.g. www.tesco.com and www.tesco.com/access. > > Is one of those seriously meant to be a "version" of the other? > I seem to remember that Tesco argue that they can only provide the main site if they can use scripting, as their server is otherwise overloaded. Because of the registration requirements, I haven't looked further, but one wonders if some of this is due to bloat.
Received on Saturday, 21 December 2002 06:04:28 UTC