- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:44:53 -0500
- To: Tina Holmboe <tina@elfi.org>, "David R. Stong" <drs18@psu.edu>
- Cc: jon@spin.ie, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
jaws does not do any enterpretation of the text. it just reads as text and relies on punctuation for inflection. it relies on a narrow subset of punctuation in fact which is period, question mark, comma, and other pause charactrs as well as exclamation. Jaws does not allow variance in inflection but processes these indicators internally to arrive at an approximation of meaningfull inflection depending on the speech synthesizer used. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Holmboe" <tina@elfi.org> To: "David R. Stong" <drs18@psu.edu> Cc: <jon@spin.ie>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:13 PM Subject: Re: JAWS doing em / strong Re: *Complex* Tables, Forms, Labeling, I'm still confused On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:15:52 -0500 "David R. Stong" <drs18@psu.edu> wrote: > to center something in a cell. The strength of inflection of a given > word may affect meaning and in so doing needs to be interpreted by > any device that interprets written words. The strength of *inflection* is indeed meaningful. I doubt anyone would ever try to argue that. But, and please correct me if I am wrong, what seems to be the case here is that Jaws uses the thickness of lines (bold face) in order to determine the strength of inflection. If I am not incorrect in that assumption, then I am afraid that I'll agree with the phrase "insane" - which is otherwise a rather dangerous word to use. Hopefully I've just misunderstood. I'd really not like to put forth questions such as "If a webpage is rendered all in bold, should it be shouted ?" or "How bold should a bold font become before it means emphasis ?" or even "Does <em>this phrase</em> rendered thinly not mean emphasis ?" -- Tina Holmboe [Windrose@DALnet] [tina@elfi.org] [tina@htmlhelp.com] $_ = <<'-- '; s/../pack("c",hex($&))/eg; eval; 7072696e7420224a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c206861636b65722c22 --
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 13:46:01 UTC