- From: <mburks952@att.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:07:05 +0000
- To: "Robert Neff" <robert.neff@uaccessit.com>
- Cc: "'WAI Interest Group'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Robert, try http://www.icdri.org/Global%20Legal% 20Resources/global_legal_resources.htm It is in need of some updating as well but is not too bad. Sincerely, Mike Burks > > Has anyone been tracking what each state has done or is planning? > > Does anyone have a grid detailing each state, requirements, dates > enacted, Dates for this to be enacted, or planning or status of > legislation? > > Robert Neff > robert.neff@uaccessit.com > 214.213.1979 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Judy Brewer > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:44 PM > To: Cynthia Waddell; Carlos A Velasco; Steve Vosloo > Cc: WAI Interest Group > Subject: RE: 508 vs. W3C > > > Cynthia, > > I believe that Carlos was describing the situation in Germany, not in > the > U.S., in response to Steve's question about Web accessibility policy in > Germany; and that his response is accurate for that context. > > With regard to states in the U.S., however, while many are adopting US > Sec. > 508, others are adopting W3C's WCAG 1.0, which addresses a broader > constituency. U.S. Sec. 508 includes fewer provisions, and explicitly > excludes certain constituencies such as those with cognitive > disabilities. > > With regard to indirect impact across both public and private sectors, > the > biggest impact will come when organizations get serious about requiring > ATAG-compliant software (authoring tools that comply with W3C's > Authoring > Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0), not just WCAG-conformant Web sites, > since that will help drive demand for authoring tool developers to > deliver > software that supports the production of accessible Web sites. So far, > one > of the only formal statements on this issue has come from the European > Parliament: > (long URI coming, and skip past the introductory material to > get > to the provisions) > > <http://europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/citizens/accessibility/ > web/wai_2002/ep_res_web_wai_2002/index_en.htm> > > - Judy > > At 06:38 PM 8/22/2002 -0700, Cynthia Waddell wrote: > > >The response by Carlos was not complete and could be misinterpreted. > >Section 508 has an indirect impact on websites other than Federal > agencies > >in the US. For a complete discussion of this impact on entities doing > >business in the US, including how Section 508 informs US entities > covered > >under the Americans with Disabilities Act and other disability rights > laws > >on how to ensure effective communication through the accessible design > of > >web sites, please see my law and policy chapters in the recently > released > >book "Constructing Accessible Web Sites." One interesting response to > the > >Section 508 effort is that a number of States have adopted Section 508 > in > >policy or legislation because they want their websites to be accessible > to > >the widest possible constituency. > > > >Best regards, > >Cynthia Waddell > > > ><...> > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On > >Behalf Of Carlos A Velasco > >Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 6:23 AM > >To: Steve Vosloo > >Cc: 'WAI IG List' > >Subject: Re: 508 vs. W3C > > > >Hi Steve, > > > >Sorry for the delay in the reply. Unfortunately it is only applicable > to > > websites of the Federal Government, not to other websites. It is not > >even applicable to state sites. > > > >regards, > >carlos > > > >Steve Vosloo wrote: > > > Hi Carlos > > > > > > Can you please tell me if Germany's requirement for level-AA > compliance > > > is for all govt sites, or also inclusive of public sites. > > > > > > Thanks > <...> > > > -- > Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI > Director, W3C's Web Accessibility Initiative > WAI Interest Group: http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG > Questions? http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/Overview.html#Uselist or wai@w3.org > Unsubscribe? "Unsubscribe" in subject line to w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 08:29:42 UTC