- From: RUST Randal <RRust@COVANSYS.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:16:55 -0400
- To: "WAI (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Personally, I don't think so. But I was involved in an interesting discussion yesterday with another developer who feels that government enforcement of Web accessibility is impeding progress. His feeling is that the inability to use Javascript to generate data on the client side puts too much pressure on the server side of things. For example, not being able to use cookies forces the developer to track everything through the server. What we were discussing are not really sites that exist for the purpose of content, or e-commerce, but rather web applications. Our web applications are really Web versions of our client-server apps. My experience has been that the client-server applications were poorly developed with little thought going into the usability of the user interface or the logical structuring of information. As a result, a lot of this thinking has carried over to the Web application. I think this is a lot of the problem, because client-server people tend to think that you can do everything on the Web the same as you can do it on the desktop. While this is partially true, it's not always the best method. The other developer's opinion is that small companies cannot afford to produce accessible applications. This is because he thinks that they should be able to use client-side scripting to do much of the work of the application - simply because it's faster and easier to develop. He thinks that because of accessibility guidelines, these small companies are now forced to spend more time and money developing and hosting web applications that are larger and more intensive than they need to be. And that this is something that these companies cannot afford to do. My opinion is that 508 and WCAG compliance is not that difficult to achieve, but you need to approach things as though everything needs to be done server-side, and then you can implement Javascript methods, rather than the other way around. In fact, I think this makes much more sense, because your server-side methods are going to be a lot more reliable than Javascript anyway (if, for example, JS is turned off, or the version you've used in not supported). I also feel that government guidelines and W3C guidelines are no big deal. Every other industry has government sanctions and industry-wide standards, so why shouldn't the Web? Randal Rust Covansys, Inc. Columbus, OH
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 08:28:52 UTC