W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: accessible sites in i-mode

From: Ineke van der Maat <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:35:41 +0200
Message-ID: <006c01c22a72$335bfca0$504e3b3e@ineke>
To: "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>, <sub@shanx.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Hello Masayasu and Shashank,

Thanks for your contributions.

At the end of the mentioned pdf-file is to be read that XHTML basic will be the
standard in future.. See http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/ for the specs.

Reading your discussion about emojis I dont want to use them, but will make my
own little emoji-icons in gif-format. I should not know why this is not
Is accessible and with accesskeys they can also be used in i-mode.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>
To: <sub@shanx.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: accessible sites in i-mode

> "Shashank Tripathi" <sub@shanx.com> wrote:
> > I have no idea what works in German i-mode devices..any idea where the
> > difference lies? Does the specificaiton there consist only of standard
> > cHTML tags?
> I happened to find English documentation (only available in PDF) from
> the Dutch i-mode site, at:
>     http://www.imode.nl/imode/0,1302,2X1046,00.html
> Looks like what is used in Europe is so-called i-mode HTML version 2.0,
> while the latest version used in Japan is version 4.0.  The major
> difference with i-mode HTML 2.0 used in Japan is those emoji mapping,
> and support for numeric charcter references like &#8364; for the Euro
> symbol.
> Probably further discussion should be moved to www-mobile@w3.org or
> somewhere else.
> Regards,
> --
> Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
> W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Saturday, 13 July 2002 09:16:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:10 UTC