- From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@mi.madritel.es>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:34:17 +0200
- To: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
And how you find: [title="Put the focus in the content"] and [title=Put the focus in the menu]. Maybe Focus is a too technical term, but it is that really makes the link. Regards, Emmanuelle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com> To: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: Re: accessible navigation | | "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net> | | > I agree and back to contant or back to navigation should be sufficient. | > remember, we are dealing here with a small window where the content | > might not be displayed. It is a tough conundrum. | | We're not dealing with a small window at all, we're dealing with an HTML | document... | | If it says back to content or back to navigation I would expect it to go | to another page with content and/or navigation I wouldn't expect it to be | within the same document, I don't see why, Also surely back is a | problematical word as it implies you've been there before - which isn't | guaranteed at all (even within the same document you could've arrived at | the content portion missing the navigation.) | | I don't have any solutions to this unfortunately. | | In documents like the W3's recommendations, it's probably okay, you have | _contents_ etc. which you can link to as _contents_ but using vague terms | like "to navigation" and "to content" I find very confusing about where | it's likely to take me. | | Jim. |
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 10:39:00 UTC