- From: Tina Marie Holmboe <tina@elfi.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:53:11 +0200
- To: Tom Gilder <w3c@tom.me.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 08:21:10PM +0100, Tom Gilder wrote:
> <a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick="window.open('http://www.w3.org/WAI/', '',
> '');">accessibility</a>
>
> ...and this on a professional development company's site.
>
> Well, it made me chuckle.
To quote myself to Tom on EFnet's #html:
"Tina's Addendum to Flavell's Law: any site that claims to deal with
accessibility issues will, with few exceptions, prove to be inaccessible"
On occation one do feel down.
I have been doing a few accessibility audits lately, and I admit to seeing
a whole lot of things which the authors clearly *believe* are accessible,
yet are not.
How does the rest of you feel about the current status: are we moving
towards a more accessible web, or are people - not to put too fine a point
on it - not giving crap ?
--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/
[+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2002 19:37:30 UTC