- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 07:40:13 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
How'd this end up on the IG list? I mean, we're still discussing a draft of version 2 of WCAG, right? My intent is not to exclude anyone on IG from participating -- after all, the WCAG archives are public -- but thought there was a specific working group mailing list for a reason. Among other reasons, it's very confusing for the more general audiences of WAI-IG to be "presented" with stuff about 3.4 (when WCAG version 1's 3.4 isn't what we're talking about), especially when it is still very much in a "rough draft" stage. Going to IG for feedback on proposals makes sense -- but not at a point in which the WCAG working group has yet to arrive at a concrete proposal, and not without giving IG a solid enough intro to the issues so that they'd be able to contribute if they hadn't been following the working group discussion. This is my long way of saying: Let's use the right mailing lists, folks. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Accessibility - W3C - Integrator Network Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2001 10:41:39 UTC