- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 07:17:14 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I have now sent a request to the www-style list. Charles wrote: it is an extension of the principle that the stuff in a link is meaningful, as applied to what is meaningful in a picture (a transparent background generally isn't), but I think we should be more explicit about that. I absolutely concur with this, and it is a laboured path. How does one 'know' that there are 2 links/images in my example? Well there is a fine continuum of demonstration, with MC Escher somewhere near the middle. Could we please have some indication of whom else we need to discuss this with, i.e. on a HTML list, or elsewhere. Re: imagemaps As I understand it, never having authored an imagemap, they are designed to have parts that do not move relative to one another, but which are clickable, that is a very different purpose, and unsuitable for single irregular shaped links, that are moveable. jonathan chetwynd IT teacher (LDD) j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.peepo.com "The first and still the best picture directory on the web"
Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 02:35:05 UTC