- From: Laurie Davis-Covin <ldavisco@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:29:22 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
For a few months I've been attempting to learn the ins and outs of font-sizes as applied to style sheets; which of the relative types work best for most browsers, what looks good, which offer most control... I've still not come to any conclusions. (I'm perplexed that some web designers are still using absolute point sizes on their "accessible" web pages. I'm leaning towards being a purist, so I don't understand that. Don't mean to sound like a 'snob' - I feel as if I'm still very much in the learning stages, and would just genuinely like to understand.) I've written style sheets that do not declare a font-size in the body element, thereby, bringing in the default 'medium' (as understand it does), then going to percentages, or using the relative 'smaller', 'larger'. I've tried pixels. But I'm getting the impression pixels are not the way to go. But, I don't know why. Is there a 'best' technique? If not best, is it okay (for accesssibility and CSS1 standards) to mix percentages and the relative '"smaller" etc., in one style sheet? It was suggested by one expert that I use an absolute font size in the body element, then go to percentages and/or relatives such as smaller, larger. I'd be grateful for your thoughts, suggestions... Thanks! Laurie Davis-Covin National Institute of Standards and Technology
Received on Monday, 26 March 2001 08:25:56 UTC