- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:03:07 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, <jacques@knowsystems.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 8:45 AM -0500 3/9/01, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >I did some editing of a couple of chapters for a book called "How to Program >in XML" or something like that. Although it didn't have accessibility as the >overriding concern they were interested in comments on it (specifically >requested it) and a number of accessibility things did get included. (I was >looking at the chapters on CSS and HTML - I don't know how much got into the >later stuff on XML). I tech edited an XHTML book last year and the author was very interested in issues of accessibility, and was glad each time I pointed out a snippet of code where the <img> tag lacked alt attributes. I don't think it's as dismal a situation as many people think, and I believe that most authors _are_ receptive of accessibility issues. The idea that they will all be mercenary and say "we only do what is commercially viable" is far too cynical; most web book authors are _not_ commercial web mercenaries, but are rather semi-jaded idealists who like to learn, teach, and write. My point is that they are our allies, not our enemies. I will see what I can do about following up on my contacts within those communities and raising awareness of accessibility issues. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 09:06:44 UTC