- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:54:34 -0500
- To: Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Browsers like lynx represent a core functionality that > should be the gold standard for accessibility simply because they > are free and open-source. If or when lynx supports standard open JavaScript then it should be considered. When did "free and open-source" become a criteria for accessibility? JavaScript, and it's international standard ECMAScript, was invented to solve some real problems. Why can't lynx "get with it" and support JavaScript? This reminds me of the days when people were ranting and raving about GUIs being in-accessible. Regards, Phill
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 19:54:50 UTC