- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:13:14 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Jim wrote: > > If each frame page has a (good, informative) title element, but there is no > name attribute or title attribute on the frame elements within the frameset > element, do you think that satisfies 12.1? I believe the answer - yes it is satisfied or not it isn't - depending on the technology being referenced in the frame. For example, in HTML the <frame element doesn't need a title= attribute if the <title element is on the html page being referenced by the <frame element. In other words, in Jim's specific case it is accessible and meets the intent of the guideline. If there were user agents or assistive technologies that presented the outline view of the frameset by using the title attribute on the <frame element, then I would have to disagree with Jim - but there are none that I know of so it's a non-issue. There are some that use the title= attribute if the <title element isn't there on the html page. But I haven't found a developer yet that put the title= attribute on without always having <titles on the html pages as well - so its quite redundant. However, if the <frame element references a non-html file, such as .jsp (java server pages), a .nsf (lotus notes served page), a .asp (Microsoft active server page), etc. or, more to the point, a media type not supported by the user agent or not discernible by the user, then the title= attribute is the only means to provide access to the intent of the frame. The example used in the HTML techniques [http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#frame-has-html-src] refers to always using html file types because that is the only way to provide the alt text for an image. I think this needs to be rethought by the WCAG working group. It seems very redundant to have an alternative <noframes> to <framesets>, and have the title= attribute on the <frame> element, and have only html file types so that the alt= attribute can be added to images. I would think that the title=attribute should be sufficient to describe the intent (as does the alt= on the <img>) of an image type file being referenced by the <frame>. Regards, Phill
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2001 15:13:25 UTC