- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:52:06 -0500 (EST)
- To: Brian Kelly <b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>
- cc: David Peaslee <peasleed@lanecc.edu>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hmm. I think the sticking block here will be the load on the validator service at W3C. It is currently one of the highest hit points on our site, and there probably isn't the capacity to add periodic rechecking of things. But there is no reason why someone else doesn't offer this service, even using the validator (it is open source and there is a download available). It's a useful feature of authoring tools - it is probably better to have something like asWedit, XMLSpy or HomeSite have a local validator so that as you author you know things are staying valid, or to use something like iCab as your browser for preview - it has a little icon that tells you whether a page is valid or not, and a warning feature that can tell you how... Or you could use something like Amaya, which makes it very hard work to make anything invalid... Cheers Charles McCN On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Brian Kelly wrote: David Peaslee sent this message to the <www-html@w3.org> and <www-talk@w3.org> lists. A reason not to have a text-only page is the difficulty on maintaining separate resources. Looking at the page referred to in the message, I notice that it has an XHTML Valid icon, and is linked back to the W3C's XHTML validator (and the page is still valid). I suspect that many pages which started off valid become corrupted when they are updated. Would it be worthwhile suggesting to W3C (and other organisations such as CAST) that these validation services could ask for the email address of a page author, and periodically check that a page is still valid, and send email if it's not. There are similar services which will send email if a page contains broken links. There is a business model for providing subscriber-funded services - and probably not too much software development work needed to develop a free one. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------- Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath BATH BA2 7AY Email: B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk Phone: (+44) 1225 323943 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Peaslee" <peasleed@lanecc.edu> To: <bmilloy@interlog.com>; <WStreett@mail.monmouth.com>; <chas@munat.com>; <aswartz@swartzfam.com> Cc: <sean@mysterylights.com>; <www-html@w3.org>; <www-talk@w3.org> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: RE: WWW: Interoperability Crisis? I author a web page that uses both HTML and a text only page using XHTML. http://www.lanecc.edu/disability/disabled.htm Why can you not add a text only page for users who are needing to access informaton from your internet page? David Peaslee, AT tech Disability Services Lane Community College 4000 E 30th Ave Eugene, OR 97405 (541) 747-4501 x 2150 peasleed@lanecc.edu >>> "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com> 01/21/01 12:57PM >>> Wilbur Streett: "If you want to help the blind do it yourself, don't force the burden onto others." So he should go to all the owners of web sites whose pages are inaccessible to the blind and offer his services for free? Let's see, if he can fix one site a day, he'll be finished in, oh... where's my calculator. Hmmm. Well! I guess he'll never finish. What exactly are you recommending, Mr. Streett? Charles F. Munat, Seattle, Washington -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2001 01:52:22 UTC