- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:09:51 -0500
- To: "Lakespur Roca" <lake@netscape.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "WAI Interest Group \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
see comments in line below. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lakespur Roca" <lake@netscape.com> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Cc: "WAI Interest Group (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:46 PM Subject: Re: Simplicity of Authoring and Accessibility Tools Something we should all remember here is that the Web is not just liberating for the disabled but for the masses. Ann, you should not only be commended for your bravery in supporting the general user but for putting up with the insensitivity of some on this list. Yes the majority of people misunderstand the medium and they will continue to misunderstand it, associating it with things like print, that they are familiar with. Strangely, print is what Xerox and Apple based some of their first wisiwig interfaces on that made the computer so ubiquitous and usable for so many people. And again print in part by this same use of metaphor lead the way to making the web so valuable as a communication tool. dp: It could as easily have gone another way had they not wedded it to print and the web for me was becoming quite useable before the invasion of the gui concept. Yes there is lots of room for improvement but we should be wary of the one step forward two steps back possibility. Changing the tools to create proper HTML and making Style sheets work in wisiwig editors will be much easier than changing the majority of people. dp: "if you build it, They will come!" Aren't you likely to change the people if you change the tools? those who resist the changes needed now will still resist the changes and so will not use the tools if they can doge them. Web page authoring and browsing should be achievable by every one even my 5 year old and I would not expect him to understand HTML or it's philosophy to create a web page of art and comments on his favorite things for his class mates and family. As Ann pointed out the web is becoming a great education tool for schools and the younger grades are still learning to read should we expect them to know html and the philosophy behind it to achieve something accessible. I don't think so. I do however agree that HTML is not very difficult to learn neither is reading or multiplication tables yet some still struggle with it. dp: and some still struggle with driving. I don't think anyone is advocating that access be denied. I do think however that a lot of early intervention is needed. I know no beast exists yet. But that doesn't mean you can't work toward the goal with diligence. Charles it rather sounds like you feel that this is wrong. I don't really think that you mean that only people who understand should be allowed to use this medium. Some learning disabilities make it very difficult to comprehend abstract concepts I don't think they should not be allowed to publish a web page. Please clarify. Anne Pemberton wrote: Charles, Some counties may indeed have the structure you prefer in place. Ourtaxes are very low, so people end up wearing two or more hats. We use whatwe have available. But, I suspect you will be equally horrified to learn that the state ofVirginia has as one of its instructional standards (for technology) that byeighth grade each Virginia student will have created their own web page. AnneAt 08:32 PM 1/18/01 -0800, Charles F. Munat wrote:I'm especially horrified to learn that the county where Anne works letspretty much *anyone* post to their official site. I think that there is amisunderstanding among many laypersons that the Internet is kind of like akiosk. You just post any old notice on it.
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 13:09:59 UTC