- From: Jim Thatcher <thatch@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:32:47 -0600
- To: wai-ig list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Mike, You can also use Bobby, a tool that checks the checkable accessibility items: http://www.cast.org/bobby. That's right, isn't it, David? Jim jim@jimthatcher.com Accessibility Consulting http://jimthatcher.com 512-306-0931 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 9:00 AM To: David Clark Cc: wai-ig list Subject: RE: Methodology I would add to this three things: One, there is a draft document being worked on by the Education and Outreach group describing the process - http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Review - which has been let lie for a wile, is in very draft stage, and probably requires reading the background material linked from it, and the Evaluation and Repair Tools group - http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG - spends their working time on the question. Two, it is also a good idea to look at a site in a graphics browser and compare the inforamtion with what you get from Lynx or home page reader - there are still pages out there that seem accessible because you don't find out that you didn't know what you were missing. Similarly there are features such as accesskey which are implemented in only a few browsers, but which are worth checking for. (I use iCab, which doesn't implement any method for activating accesskey as far as I can tell, but puts a little marker to identify wht the key is). There is a list of tools that the Evaluation and Repair Tools group maintains which provides links to a number of handy things. It is worth keeping up to date with that list (and asking for stuff to be added if it isn't there). cheers Charles McCN On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, David Clark wrote: Mike, I am get trashed for saying this, but I think the easiest way of getting a quick overview is to use a text-based browser like Lynx. This will give you a baseline overview of the understandability of a page and the major areas that need work. Once this is done, you can go on and use an audio browser like IBM's Homepage Reader. Hope this helps. dc --------------- David M. Clark 16 Harcourt Street, #2I Boston, MA 02116 617-859-3069 : 401-679-0239 (eFax) : 617-290-3410 (cell) http://www.davidsaccess.com david@davidsaccess.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mike Baker Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 4:42 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Methodology Can anyone share a methodology for testing and analyzing existing sites for accessibility? I'm curious as to which specific steps you feel are essential and where the majority of your focus lies. Thanks, Mike Baker bakerm@zin-tech.com ZIN Technologies, Inc. 3000 Aerospace Parkway ~ Brook Park, OH 44142 Phone: 216/977-0363 ~ Fax: 216/977-0421 -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 10:34:42 UTC