- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:32:07 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Graham, Please may I second what Miraz and David have said. At 08:20 AM 2001-06-05 +0100, David Woolley wrote: > >- forms often do not cover the cases that I'm interested in.. > Here is the key point for customer care, or the quality benefits that you gain from gathering feedback. The people with the answers most always see the world through a more fine-grained set of pigeonholes than do the people with the questions or complaints [That's a FAQ]. For emotional and "comfortable language" considerations, you always want to give the customer room to vent in their own terms, without forcing them to cram what they have to say into a set of narrow pigeonholes. This implies accepting email feedback. This is costly, It is a lot cheaper to run a form and just look at the spreadsheet of the aggregated form results, but you get what you pay for. Forms and spreadsheets will not tell you about usability or accessibility issues with your site that you probably did not anticipate in your design and your form, or you wouldn't have the problem. Because the implementation of mailto: URLs is spotty, you should really have an email address in the plain text of the page as well as automation using a mailto: URL. This can be indirect via a direct link to your "contact us" page if you wish. But Miraz is right. You should offer the user a choice. Here is an area where the technology does not capture enough of the user preference distribution into one technical approach for you to rely entirely on one technique. People's comfort levels with different technologies amenable to feedback vary all over the lot. If you really want to hear from people, you will tool up for multiple modes to cover that diversity. AND, while we are on it, the usability problems for forms for people with disabilities are severe enough at this time so that if you do choose to implement a feedback form only, you are significantly hurting your chances of hearing from this constituency. At least if you look at the penetration studies of the AFB for people with visual disabilities, I believe that you will find many more are fully at home sending an email as compared with how comfortable they are filling out a form. Al
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 10:30:12 UTC