- From: Michael R. Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:01:41 -0400
- To: "Ineke van der Maat" <inekemaa@xs4all.nl>, "Nouiouat, Athmane" <athmane.nouiouat@sap.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <NEBBJFEIALPLCLHAPJAIIEOPDDAA.mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
Seems to me this is called Universal Design. Sincerely, Mike Burks -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ineke van der Maat Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:59 AM To: Nouiouat, Athmane; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Democracy Hallo Athmane, As webdesigner and also as one of the founders of the green party in the Netherlands I am already very interested in your book. Can you explain me what the difference is between a liberal and a conservative website? Till now the western industries make people dependent on their technology. It's better to offer your knowledge about that technology so that people have really a free choice and can apply it themselves to their own wishes. That is in my opinion the only manner to offer democratic options. Or was that what you meant to say? Kind regards from the Netherlands Ineke van der Maat Without getting in the details, I was trying to make a philosophical point about: 1- the Design of Sites should be based on all possible types of users out there thus the concept of User Classes, from the most liberal to the most conservative styles (isn't that democracy!). I believe we will be more successfull by giving choices as opposed to mandating options. 2- Who are we to mandate to 6 Billion people how to design or what to put in their Web sites? Why not provide all, technically possible, options through the technology and let people (the users, designers, etc) choose. I could probably write a book about this! Take care athmane
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: bolveld.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2001 01:05:54 UTC