- From: Graham Oliver <graham_oliver@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 18:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
- To: jim@jimthatcher.com, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Davey Leslie <davey@inx-jp.org>
- Cc: Kelly Ford <kelly@kellford.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Jim Sorry about not being clearer with my reference. Here is an extract from the page http://www.to-2008.com/english/accessibility.asp <start extract> Navigation menu bypass People who use screen readers are interpret content in a linear fashion. That is, they read content from left to right and from top to bottom (when content is within a table). We provide an invisible link at the top of each page to bypass the navigation menu, allowing users instant access to the non repetitive content of each page. <end extract> I searched the source and couldn't find any code to skip links, that's all, hence my reference to testing. Graham Jim Thatcher wrote: Hi there,It's easy for web access related sites or sites that are specificallydisabilities related like www.acb.org, where the skip navigation started, tohave visible skip navigation links. But Commercial sites are not willing(for good reason) to have such a link clutter their design, e.g. www.ibm.comand www.cnn.com (also www.assistivetech.net and www.firstgov.gov). The linksare there for blind users. There is no reason for them to be visible. Thereare good reasons for having them not visible - they don't clutter the viewfor people who look at the screen. It is "clutter" more than pixel clutter.It is user interface clutter. "What does that link do," a sighted userworries.What is the relevance of the to-2008 sight(http://www.to-2008.com/english/accessibility.asp). Did you think they hadlinks to skip navigation?Jimjim@jimthatcher.comAccessibility Consultinghttp://jimthatcher.com512-306-0931-----Original Message-----From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]OnBehalf Of Graham OliverSent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 7:12 PMTo: Charles McCathieNevile; Davey LeslieCc: Kelly Ford; w3c-wai-ig@w3.orgSubject: Re: Skipping navigation tacticsI am not really in favour of hiding the link, have alook at this page.http://www.to-2008.com/english/accessibility.aspI can't find the skip links in the html, it may bethere but that's one of the problems, it becomesharder to test.I like what they do on the HTML Writers Guild site,putting the skip links on the top right rather thanthe top left, it's easier to ignore then for peoplewho don't want/need to use it.Charles McCathieNevile wrote: Yes. I am a visualuser, but have problems from time to time withusingamouse. So hiding things too much is annoying. (On theother hand, things comeup in the tabbing order, so aslong as there is a focus that is clearlyvisible I knowI have hit a link and just need to check the statusbar tofind out what is going on. I guess that's lesscool if you're usingmagnification. Anythoughts?chaalsOn Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Davey Lesliewrote:I wonder if hiding the "skip links" from graphicbrowsers--which I've doneon a couple of sites with theinvisible gif trick--is really a good idea.I'mstarting to have second and third thoughts about it.What about folkswho can't use a mouse? Isn't the "skiplinks" useful for them?Just wondering...Davey Leslie--Charles McCathieNevilehttp://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134136W3C Web Accessibility Initiativehttp://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999Location: 21Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia(or W3CINRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 SophiaAntipolis Cedex, France)__________________________________________________Do You Yahoo!?Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2001 21:22:42 UTC