- From: Mitake Holloman Burts <mitake@klas.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:50:36 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
--On 7/19/00 6:01 PM +0100 Brian Kelly <lisbk@ukoln.ac.uk> wrote: > I guess a disabled person with learning disabilities who uses a > foot-pedal would prefer > "Press foot pedal" rather than "Click here" or something device > independent. There's an opportunity for some personalisation here. My problem with "click here" has nothing to do with the mouse-centric nature of the term click and everything to do with making the link able to stand on its own. To use the site that started this conversation as an example: Upon seeing Mr Poehlman's posting on the IE/JAWS rendering of the site my first reaction was click for details on what? After looking at the site I see that it is a list of dates and the cities of the tour which form that list of links. Each link has the title "click for deatils," which in the rendering appears to obscure the text of the link. What was a servicable set of links is now almost useless for this particular user agent combination. Is this perhaps a case of the AT being too helpful? What kind of advice can we give developer who we tell to always have a title for a link, even when they have produced a link that stands by itself? I think that things (which the site has done) such as making the headlines of the stories links instead of making the user who is tabbing through the links guess which "full story" they are going to are helpful. Its this kind of change that we should look to promote instead of focusing on the semantics of mousing vs. keyboarding. Mitake Holloman Burts mitake@klas.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2000 14:51:21 UTC