- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:31:26 -0500 (EST)
- To: pjenkins@us.ibm.com
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Another possibility: The alt for the image should be "MD TAP" (or spell out the acronym - but that's a separate question). The title should be "MD TAP logo". The title of the link element (the <a href...) should be the destination. There is a question of whether or not that clearly identifies the target of the link (to use current WCAG language). And a part of that might be whether the logo alone, if it is not very informative, or obvious in the context, satisfies the requirement for visual users. Charles McCN On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 pjenkins@us.ibm.com wrote: Gregory wrote: quote why? the important piece of information to be conveyed here is the destination of the hyperlink, not the actual content of the graphic -- that's what LONGDESC is for... what would i gain from a hyperlink whose hyperlink text is "MD TAP logo"? that is extremely uninformative, from the point of view of anyone accessing this page using a non-visual user agent, regardless of their visual acuity... unquote PJ: The visual image link is just as uninformative as alt="MD TAP logo". So, are you arguing that BOTH the visual image link and the alt=text should be more informative? That's fine, but they are equally accessible and equally uninformative as is. Beside improving the visual image and the alt=text to be equally informative, the author also has the title=attribute and the longdesc=attribute. Regards, Phill Jenkins -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2000 12:31:30 UTC