- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:07 -0500
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Cc: "Web Accessibility Initiative" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sigh. I am somebody who cares and _I_ can't keep the advice straight! It sounds like things worked for you well. Are you saying I should my code in deference to browsers which don't handle TITLE correctly? I had ALT and TITLE reversed before, but changed it based on discussions from the WAI list! The last "rule" I remember consensus (?!) on is that A HREF TITLE attribute should be what is used by TITLE in the HEAD section of the referenced page (logical enough). I have also gotten the advice (also from someone on this list, my apologies for forgetting who) that ALT associated with a link should use a verb. The IMG in question is a take on their logo that incorporates the letters "M D" and "T A P". The graphic gives no clue as to what "MD TAP" might be, so "Jump to MD TAP" seems like very appropriate ALT tag content to me. Should ALT contain _more_ information than is contained by the image? I sincerely hope we don't get into discussing ABBR and ACRONYM for GIFs... > -----Original Message----- > From: Gregory J. Rosmaita [mailto:unagi69@concentric.net] > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 3:26 PM > To: Bruce Bailey > Cc: WAI Interest Group Emailing List > Subject: RE: Tool Tip behavior > > > aloha, bruce! > > <a href="http://www.mdtap.org/" > title="Maryland Technology Assistance Project"><img > src="images/tap-logo.gif" > alt="Jump to MD TAP." > border="0" width="88" height="31"></a> > > JFW 3.5 (in conjunction with MSIE 5.01) reads the TITLE defined for the > buttons, and not the ALT text, so that when i tab-to the tap-logo > button, i > hear: > > Maryland Technology Assistance Project > > but the document source reveals that the ALT text is defined as > "Jump to MD > TAP", which i personally find less informative than the TITLE defined for > the link... > > don't have sighted assistance at hand to tell you the ToolTip behavior, > though... > > gregory.
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2000 17:50:36 UTC