- From: Marti <marti47@MEDIAONE.NET>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:55:18 -0500
- To: "Dine, Brooke" <Brooke.Dine@mail.house.gov>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
In addition to the problems you noted with this site a couple of pages into it, it starts using frames that have no titles and there does not appear to be any <noframes> so I would say this NOT an accessible site. Marti ----- Original Message ----- From: Dine, Brooke <Brooke.Dine@mail.house.gov> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 11:35 AM Subject: Is this site accessible? > > Hello All: > > > > I've come across an interesting article which states that the Victoria's > > Secret site is a completely accessible site. It was picked as the site of > > the week by CommArt.com (just for Valentine's Day!) and the article is > > located at http://www.commarts.com/interactive/index.html. The site is > > located at http://www.victoriassecret.com. > > > > I looked at the site in IE 5.0 with the graphics turned off and javascript > > disabled. The top of the page lacks alt tags for graphics, etc. and it is > > only when you scroll to the middle of the page that your see the "text > > only" link. This links to the bottom of the page where all of the > > categories are listed in a site map style layout. However, when you > > select the links from this page, you are directed back into the graphic > > pages with haphazard "alt" tags, etc. And the descriptions for the items > > seem to lack essential information for someone who is visually impaired to > > truly understand what they are trying to purchase. Once you click to the > > item's page, there is a decent description of the item, but the color, > > size and quantity are presented in three separate drop down boxes. > > > > I checked the URL against Bobby and it passed with the exception of one > > instance where there was no provision of alternative content for each > > SCRIPT that conveys important information or function, and they needed to > > ensure that descriptions of dynamic content are updated with changes in > > content. > > > > I would argue that they've attempted to make their site somewhat > > accessible, but they have not been completely thorough in providing alt > > tags, etc. (This is just my opinion.) I'm working very hard to understand > > how to make a site compliant, so, I'm always looking for examples of sites > > which are designed with accessibility in mind. > > > Any opinions on this site would be appreciated, and should be > interesting considering the subject matter! > > > Thanks for your input. > > > Regards. > Brooke Dine > Sr. Web Developer > Office of the Clerk > U.S. House of Representatives > Washington, DC 20515 > 202.226.4943 >
Received on Monday, 14 February 2000 15:15:26 UTC