- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:16:09 -0800 (PST)
- To: charles@w3.org, unagi69@concentric.net
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Perhaps it's an indication that there needs be an additional phrase or sentence to emphasize the intent. I often use examples to be sure that the meaning is getting through. Scott > aloha, charles! > > you observed: > > quote > This article repeats a common myth that the use o colour will be restricted > by accesibility requirements. This is "more or less bunk", based as far as > I can tell on a failure to understand a very simple sentence in a W3C > recommendation: "Do not use colour alone to convey information". Note the > use of the word "Alone" in that sentence. > unquote > > it is the product of accepting on faith that something is proscribed simply > because someone told you that it is... in journalistic circles there once > existed a quaint custom called checking one's facts, which has, apparently, > died out... sloppy reporting isn't anything new, but the failure of the > technological press to understand the true issues is pretty damn > depressing... one would think that, especially in a technological setting, > checking one's facts would be as fundamental as validating pages before > exposing them to the world, but, then... > > oh, well, > gregory
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2000 22:16:28 UTC