- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 08:35:13 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- CC: Taylor-Made <taymade@home.com>, "Benjamin J. Simpson" <arcben@hotmail.com>
I've handled this by linking to the "text-only" version of sites or by linking to an inside frame rather than a home page. If this doesn't work, I will include a short alert "warning, frames". Taylor-Made wrote: > Yes, I believe it would be. Unfortunately, you cannot be responsible for > the accessibility of the sites you have links to unless the links go to your > other pages. If the links go to sites that are outside of your site, one > knows that the site design was done by someone else and may not be as > accessible. > > Not all designers design for accessbility. Only those who are aware that > accessbility is even an issue are the designers who strive to make their > sites viewable to as many people as possible. > > IMHFO, > Joyce > > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin J. Simpson <arcben@hotmail.com> > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Date: Friday, June 02, 2000 6:29 PM > Subject: absolute location > > >Would a web site that has 'entirely accessible internal content' be > >considered accessible if it had links to non-accesible, external resources? > > > >Especially if those links to external resources add to the value of the > >site. For example, an accessible page of "The Top 10 Movie Sites", with > >links to movie sites that are non-accessible. > >
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2000 08:35:00 UTC