- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:39:43 -0700
- To: "Bruce Bailey" <bbailey@clark.net>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 6:15 PM -0400 6/1/00, Bruce Bailey wrote: >Or is this a general design issue, and therefore not in the domain of the >WCAG? "Use sensible file names for your HTML documents" is not in the WCAG >either. Can anyone point me to a reference (with face validity) that >includes such basics? Using sensible file names is not a requirement nor should it be. The URI scheme is not meant to convey information or data -- it is meant to be an almost-entirely arbitrary system (once past the protocol and hostname identifiers) that associate arbitrary content with a unique identifier. There is no requirement that the unique identifier be human readable, human readable, human parsable, or convey any information at all apart from uniqueness. -- -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 21:04:14 UTC