W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Anchor Names -- a P4 item?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0005311739450.7673-100000@tux.w3.org>
As far as I know, anchor names are not read by anything except machines. If
you want a meaningful title for a section anchor you should use the title

Charles McCN

On Wed, 31 May 2000, Bruce Bailey wrote:

  Did "use meaningful labels for internal document anchors" not make it into
  the WCAG?  For example, using <A NAME="terminology"> versus <A
  If so, where is it?
  If not, isn't this a P2 or at least P3 usability issue?
  Aren't anchor names vocalized by screen readers?

Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2000 17:40:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:35:56 UTC