- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:38:53 -0400
- To: <jim@jimthatcher.com>, "Web Accessibility Initiative" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Dear Jim, Thanks for your comments. I didn't spot any links that were in onMouseOver content that were more than one page away from the home page. (1) My personal prejudice is strongly against "text-only parallel sites" because (a) they really shouldn't be necessary, (b) they are rarely truly parallel, (c) it fosters acceptance of the idea of a "disability ghetto". (2) I don't see that an alternative homepage, if that's all that is needed, would make things any better for a screen reader user. Current page, using onMouseOver: Home Page -> onMouseOver sub-menu -> Target Page (one "click") Current page, using screen reader or keyboard: (two "clicks") Home Page -> sub-menu page -> Target Page Alternative home page: Home Page -> "text-only" page -> Target Page (two "clicks") What is the advantage? Add to this the problem that the "text-only" page would have about five times the number of links as the current home page, it could actually be LESS function than the current two-tiered version. I think Sailor is not in trouble with onMouseOver content ONLY because the sub-menu pages are already well developed. If they did not have those, they would have to be building the them from scratch, and that WOULD be a fair amount of work. I think they will be moving the Infotract / Sun Spot / GPO etc. menu up higher on the page. Is that what you were referring to as a navigation bar? -- Thank you. Bruce > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Thatcher [mailto:thatch@attglobal.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 7:41 PM > To: Bruce Bailey; Web Accessibility Initiative > Subject: RE: Request for site review > > > Bruce, > > I don't understand why you say the duplicate content won't help > lynx or screen reader users. The sub-menu a mouse user sees as the result > of the mouseover is on the page you get by following (clicking) the topic. > It is complete equivalent content as far as I am concerned. > > If you were to add "skip navigation" it would be equivalent access as > well. That sub-menu is so simple, but one has to wander through all the > navigation stuff to find the simple menu at what turns out to be the > bottom of the page. > > Jim > Jim@Jimthatcher.com > 512-306-0931 >
Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 09:42:16 UTC