- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:39:24 -0500
- To: Claude Sweet <sweetent@home.com>
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, WAI Interest Group Emailing List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
assume as much public media does a 3rd grade level education when writing your descriptions. There are many opinions, but the fact is that if you keep it generic and don't refer to in jokes or leave the <reader> hanging with coloquialisms unless pertenant, it is doable. I will dug up urls where this has been done quite well. Let's get on with the experement. What matters more than whether or not a person had sight is how much of what people talk about and they read about they are able to assimilate into something that at least for them has meaning. Thanks! -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s Touching The Internet: mailto:poehlman@clark.net Voice: 301.949.7599 ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://poehlman.clark.net Dynamic Solutions Inc. Best of service for your small business network needs! http://www.dnsolutions.com ---sig off---
Received on Friday, 12 November 1999 12:39:45 UTC