- From: Marlene Bruce <marlene@amazingmedia.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 13:01:13 -0400
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>, Joan Piroch <d4951@sccoast.net>, "Neff, Robert" <Robert.Neff@usmint.treas.gov>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
If you're using a constrained width table, I would recommend no wider than 590 (this also accommodates an audience which likes to print your pages). For a relevant discussion, please see: "640 x 480 Isn't Dead Just Yet" http://evolt.org/index.cfm?menu=8&cid=275&catid=22 I'm curious if there are downsides to variable (percentage) width tables. I've used them (usually maxed to 95%), to accommodate each person's preferred text and browser window sizes. Marlene P.S. I'm new here, and I don't know if this forum is a place where design issues are discussed. I don't want to continue a thread which might be considered irrelevant to the topics of this list, so if I have, please excuse me. At 11:21 AM 10/1/99 -0700, Jon Gunderson wrote: >To help more people with visual impairments I would design for 640x480, >than 600x800. >Jon
Received on Friday, 1 October 1999 12:58:46 UTC