- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:12:30 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I'm looking for some examples of very graphic web sites designed by fancy artist types that contain all sorts of sophisticated neat bells and whistles but still manage to remain *demonstrably accessible* [i.e., they can pass Bobby] without the use of a text-only version of the site. As I was explaining to a friend, the "accessibility meme" spreads very slowly among graphically oriented artist types, I suspect because they have hear the myths (http://aware.hwg.org/why/myths.html) that accessible web sites are visually boring web sites. And thus you get pages such as I design (http://www.hwg.org, http://aware.hwg.org/, http://www.kynn.com) which are accessible and rather "cleanly laid out" but are far from visually stimulating or artistic. So what are examples of sites loaded up with the newest and the loudest technology that still degrade nicely? I ask for sites that can pass Bobby because I need to _show_ people that these sites are accessible, and when you're dealing with a graphical web designer type, it's much more impressive to _show_ them something like Bobby compliance than to _tell_ them "a blind friend of mine says she can use this site." "Show, not tell" is an important cliche! -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Catch the Web Accessibility Meme! http://aware.hwg.org/ Next Online Course starts August 2 http://www.kynn.com/+nextclass
Received on Thursday, 24 June 1999 16:17:30 UTC