- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:15:48 -0700
- To: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 12:49 PM 6/18/1999 , Anne Pemberton wrote: >For Ann Navarro and others who have been asking for examples, I think this >site is a good "first" example of how "meaningful graphics" can make the >information on a web site accessible to those who depend on graphics for >comprehension. It is a good example of what I mean by the term "meaningful >graphics". I think that you can find plenty of examples of sites that use graphics effectively; that's never been in question. The problems arise in defining what exactly are "meaningful graphics" and how that applies to ALL pages. Pointing at a site that manages to use graphics well just tells you that some sites can use graphics well; perhaps it's due to the nature of this site (a very tiny catalog of services available from one company) but it may not be generally applicable to all sites. A better example would be to take a site that most of us would agree is very "textual" -- such as the W3C site or Jakob Nielsen's useit.com -- and explain what graphics are necessary there to increase understanding for limited textual comprehension users. -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Friday, 18 June 1999 16:34:08 UTC